Massachusetts Anti-Casino Ballot Question Gets Nixed by State AG
A citizens’ anti-gambling initiative has been shot down by the State’s Attorney General
While the continuing state of Massachusetts is gearing up for rapid expansion of gambling in the state, not everyone has been excited about the move. That’s why some anti-gambling activists there have created a petition in an effort to force a vote that is statewide set up casino projects will be able to move ahead.
People who are against the casinos that are new able to gather sufficient signatures to send the ballot question forward to the attorney general’s office. But regrettably for them, the state solicitor but a stop to your move, saying that the ballot question wouldn’t be legal under the state’s ballot effort process.
Constitutional Provisions Preclude Ballot Question
The ballot initiative process is covered by Article 48 under the current state Constitution. That article not just outlines the process for getting a relevant concern in the ballot, but also establishes what can and may not be included in such concerns. One of the rules for proposals states that they cannot interfere with an entity’s ‘right to receive settlement for personal property appropriated to public use’.
According to state solicitor Peter Sacks, if the question were to be authorized by the public, thus closing the casino deals immediately, it might simply take the casino developers’ contract rights away without the payment. It would also ‘impair the implied agreements’ between the aristocrat indian dreaming slot machine download Massachusetts Gaming Commission and the ones designers, who have already paid millions in application fees towards the state. Continue reading